Vår AI-detekteringsteknologi

Multi-layered analysis combining cutting-edge machine learning with proven forensic techniques

We use six complementary detection methods to provide the most accurate AI image detection available. Each method analyzes different aspects of the image to identify signs of artificial generation.

ML Detection

Hugging Face Transformer Model

Our machine learning detection uses state-of-the-art transformer models trained on millions of images to distinguish between authentic photographs and AI-generated content.

92% Average Accuracy 40% Detection Weight

PRNU Analysis

Sensor Fingerprint Detection

Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) detects unique camera sensor fingerprints from manufacturing imperfections. AI images cannot replicate these authentic sensor signatures.

85-95% Accuracy 25% Weight

Frekvensanalys

DCT Spectrum Analysis

Frequency domain analysis examines the distribution of high and low frequency components in an image. AI-generated images typically lack the natural high-frequency noise present in real photographs.

78% Average Accuracy 20% Detection Weight

Gradient Analysis

Edge & Texture Detection

Analyzes edge patterns and texture characteristics using Sobel, Canny, and Laplacian operators. AI images often have unnaturally smooth or uniform gradients.

83-89% Accuracy 10% Weight

GAN Fingerprint

Artifact Detection

Detects GAN-specific artifacts like checkerboard patterns, color banding, and spectral anomalies unique to generative adversarial networks.

80-88% Accuracy 15% Weight

Texture Analysis

LBP Pattern Detection

Local Binary Pattern analysis for texture anomalies common in AI-generated images. Measures uniformity, entropy, and homogeneity.

78-85% Accuracy 12% Weight

Noise Pattern

Noise Uniformity Detection

Real photographs contain unique noise patterns from camera sensors that vary across the image. AI-generated images have unnaturally uniform noise distribution.

75% Average Accuracy 10% Detection Weight

Metadata Analysis

EXIF & Software Detection

Image metadata contains valuable clues about its origin. We analyze EXIF data, software signatures, and other embedded information to identify AI generation tools.

70% Average Accuracy 15% Detection Weight

Anatomy Detection

Hand & Face Analysis

AI image generators often create anatomical errors that humans immediately recognize as wrong. We use computer vision to detect these telltale mistakes.

85% When Issues Found 10% Detection Weight

C2PA Verification

Content Provenance Standard

C2PA (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity) is an industry standard for tracking the origin and history of digital content through cryptographic signatures.

100% When Present Definitive Priority Evidence

Semantic Inconsistency Detection

Logic & Physics Validation

Detects logical inconsistencies like incorrect shadows, impossible perspectives, distorted reflections, and violations of physical laws that AI often produces.

88-94% Accuracy 11% Weight

Human Biometric Analysis

Finger, Eye & Skin Detection

Uses MediaPipe to analyze human anatomy for incorrect finger counts, asymmetric eyes, unnatural skin texture, and other anatomical anomalies common in AI-generated faces.

85-93% Accuracy 11% Weight

Lighting Physics Validation

Shadow & Color Temperature

Validates light source consistency, shadow direction physics, specular highlight accuracy, and color temperature uniformity across the image.

82-90% Accuracy 9% Weight

Compression Artifact Analysis

JPEG Forensics

Analyzes JPEG compression artifacts to estimate quality levels and detect re-compression patterns that indicate image manipulation or AI generation.

75-85% Accuracy 7% Weight

Edge Sharpness Analysis

Depth-of-Field Consistency

Analyzes sharpness distribution across the image and validates depth-of-field consistency. AI often produces unnaturally uniform sharpness.

78-86% Accuracy 6% Weight

Statistical Pattern Analysis

Entropy & Benford's Law

Analyzes statistical properties including Shannon entropy, histogram patterns, and Benford's Law compliance to detect synthetic image characteristics.

70-80% Accuracy 4% Weight

Chromatic Aberration Analysis

Missing Lens Artifacts

Detects the absence of chromatic aberration (color fringing) that real camera lenses produce. AI images lack these optical artifacts.

65-75% Accuracy 3% Weight

Micro-Texture Analysis

Texture Repetition Detection

Analyzes microscopic texture patterns for repetition, uniformity, and unnatural randomness that AI generators often exhibit.

68-78% Accuracy 3% Weight

Color Palette Analysis

Saturation & Color Diversity

Analyzes color distribution including saturation levels, color diversity, and white balance consistency. AI images often have oversaturated colors.

65-75% Accuracy 3% Weight

Ensemble Analysis

All methods are combined using weighted scoring to produce a final verdict with confidence level.

ML Detection
16%
Semantic
11%
Biometric
11%
Lighting
9%
Compression
7%
PRNU Analysis
7%
GAN Fingerprint
7%
Edge Sharpness
6%
Texture Analysis
5%
Frequency
4%
Statistical
4%
Chromatic Aberr.
3%
Micro Texture
3%
Color Palette
3%
Gradient
2%
Noise Pattern
1%
Metadata
1%
17 Detection Methods Combined Σ 100%

Relaterade metoder

ML Detection

Our machine learning detection uses state-of-the-art transformer models trained on millions of images to distinguish between authentic photographs and AI-generated content.

PRNU Analysis

Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) detects unique camera sensor fingerprints from manufacturing imperfections. AI images cannot replicate these authentic sensor signatures.

Frekvensanalys

Frequency domain analysis examines the distribution of high and low frequency components in an image. AI-generated images typically lack the natural high-frequency noise present in real photographs.

Gradient Analysis

Analyzes edge patterns and texture characteristics using Sobel, Canny, and Laplacian operators. AI images often have unnaturally smooth or uniform gradients.

Noise Pattern

Real photographs contain unique noise patterns from camera sensors that vary across the image. AI-generated images have unnaturally uniform noise distribution.

Metadata Analysis

Image metadata contains valuable clues about its origin. We analyze EXIF data, software signatures, and other embedded information to identify AI generation tools.

GAN Fingerprint

Detects GAN-specific artifacts like checkerboard patterns, color banding, and spectral anomalies unique to generative adversarial networks.

Texture Analysis

Local Binary Pattern analysis for texture anomalies common in AI-generated images. Measures uniformity, entropy, and homogeneity.

Anatomy Detection

AI image generators often create anatomical errors that humans immediately recognize as wrong. We use computer vision to detect these telltale mistakes.

C2PA Verification

C2PA (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity) is an industry standard for tracking the origin and history of digital content through cryptographic signatures.

Semantic Inconsistency Detection

Detects logical inconsistencies like incorrect shadows, impossible perspectives, distorted reflections, and violations of physical laws that AI often produces.

Human Biometric Analysis

Uses MediaPipe to analyze human anatomy for incorrect finger counts, asymmetric eyes, unnatural skin texture, and other anatomical anomalies common in AI-generated faces.

Lighting Physics Validation

Validates light source consistency, shadow direction physics, specular highlight accuracy, and color temperature uniformity across the image.

Compression Artifact Analysis

Analyzes JPEG compression artifacts to estimate quality levels and detect re-compression patterns that indicate image manipulation or AI generation.

Edge Sharpness Analysis

Analyzes sharpness distribution across the image and validates depth-of-field consistency. AI often produces unnaturally uniform sharpness.

Statistical Pattern Analysis

Analyzes statistical properties including Shannon entropy, histogram patterns, and Benford's Law compliance to detect synthetic image characteristics.

Chromatic Aberration Analysis

Detects the absence of chromatic aberration (color fringing) that real camera lenses produce. AI images lack these optical artifacts.

Micro-Texture Analysis

Analyzes microscopic texture patterns for repetition, uniformity, and unnatural randomness that AI generators often exhibit.

Color Palette Analysis

Analyzes color distribution including saturation levels, color diversity, and white balance consistency. AI images often have oversaturated colors.

Kontrollera bild

All methods are combined using weighted scoring to produce a final verdict with confidence level.

Prova nu